OLAREX Web Directory

Unlike for alternative business structures, where we have unlimited fining powers, we can only currently issue fines to traditional law firms, or individual solicitors, of up to £2,000. Increasing its fining threshold to £25,000, would mean a broader range of disciplinary matters could be dealt with by the SRA directly, without cases needing to be referred to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT). This would mean cases could be resolved quickly, potentially reducing the cost, resource and stress burden a hearing places on all involved. It could also free up time at the SDT to progress the most serious cases. We are proposing that for more serious cases it is able to fine firms up 5% of annual turnover, as well as the introduction of measures which would take account of income when setting fines for individuals. This would, for example, allow different levels of fine to be issued to a low earning junior solicitor compared to a senior equity partner for similar offences. Introducing ‘fixed penalties’ for certain lower- level misconduct would not only allow more straight forward issues to be dealt with more easily for all concerned, but it would also provide greater transparency and consistency in how penalties were applied. Solicitors and firms fined by the SRA would retain the right to appeal both the outcome of any decision and penalty imposed at the SDT. The consultation also looks at a more robust approach to penalising serious misconduct that ensures sanctions are consistent and act as an effective deterrent across the whole of the legal profession – for example, in the light of the Bar Tribunals & Adjudications Service’s proposed approach to issue automatic suspensions in cases of sexual harassment, in addition to any financial penalty. - Listing Details

The best team of specialists in the EU and the CIS, helping businesses find the right answers to any legal questions - this is Antwort Law. We have no equal in legal and tax support of international IT, financial and investment projects. - Listing Details

Many of those who bring cases are not legally trained and do not know how to compile evidence correctly and may find it difficult to structure said evidence in a cohesive manner to present to their legal firm with a summary of the case. Clients on low incomes may have further difficulties in accessing emails, printers, scanners or even the internet. Many are caught within the endless cycle of service jumping as many cannot find a service that can completely fill their legal needs and thus keep being referred from one place to another. The limited advice they get from pro bono sessions with lawyers are sporadic and can only be within a 30-minute time span in many cases. To combat this, we have secured a partnership with 350 law firms that provides a 24/7 legal advice live chat tool on our website to give quick, accessible advice at one’s convenience. - Listing Details